Skip to main content

NCDRC ORDERS REFUND TO HOMEBUYER FOR DELAY OF 1 YEAR


Recently in the case of Shalabh Nigam vs Orris Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. & Ors., the Apex Consumer Commission (NCDRC) , giving hope to lakhs of aggrieved homebuyers, has quantified a time period of one year for delayed projects beyond which homebuyers/investors can claim refund from builders.

The Hon’ble Supreme Court and Consumer Courts have repeatedly held that homebuyers cannot be made to wait indefinitely, but the issue relating to when refund can be claimed in case of delay was not clarified. The plea was preferred by a Delhi resident Shalabh Nigam, who booked a flat in 2012 in the luxury housing project, Greenopolis, in Gurgaon being developed by Orris Infrastructure and 3C Company.

The Buyer had made a payment of around Rs 90 lakh against the total cost of around Rs 1 crore. As per the Builder-Buyer Agreement, the flat was to be handed over within 36 months, with a grace period of six months, from the date of allotment. The Buyer approached NCDRC  seeking its direction for either refund or time-bound possession of the flat when the builder failed to complete the project within the specified time.


The commission directed the builder to complete the construction and hand over the flat, complete in all respects as per the agreement, by end of September 2019 after obtaining occupancy certificate and to pay compensation at the rate of 6% per year on the total deposit for the delayed period even after handing over Possession. It further directed the builder that in case of non-delivery of flat within the deadline prescribed by commission, NCDRC, the builder will have to refund the entire amount with 10% interest.

The Court further observed -
“It is now established that allottees have the right to ask for refund if possession is inordinately delayed, particularly beyond one year,”

On the contention of the builder that the buyer had discontinued paying installments and if refund is ordered, then there will be a forfeit of 10% of the amount as earnest money, as per the agreed clause, the commission rejected the same stating that the installments were paid up to the 7th stage and the payment was stopped later as there was no progress in the construction.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

ED Arrests Builder in Rs 2,000 Crore Fraud with Homebuyers

CA Ramesh Agrawal The ED has arrested four promoters of Earth Infrastructures Ltd. on 1 st June 2026 for Rs. 2004+ Crore fraud under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA). The accused Avdhesh Kumar Goel, Rajnish Mittal, Atul Gupta and Vikas Gupta are the directors / promotors of the company. They were presented before a special PMLA court in Delhi. The court granted five days custody to ED for interrogation. As per the agency, Rs. 2004+ Crore has been collected by the Earth Group from more than 19,425 Home Buyers and Investors promising assured returns and timely delivery of the projects. Rs. 467 Crore has been diverted through Group Companies and other related individuals & concerns. The ED told that “Despite receipt of substantial funds from the buyers/investors, the projects were either left incomplete or possession of units was not handed over, thereby causing wrongful loss to the homebuyers and investors,”. The investigation of the agency further revealed that a...

RERA SHOULD BE ABOLISHED - SUPREME COURT

  CA Ramesh Agrawal On 12 th February 2026, the Supreme Court expressed serious dissatisfaction with the functioning of the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA), indicating that the institution, should be abolished in its current form. In this regard please note: - The Hon. Supreme Court strongly criticized the current functioning & working of RERA and observed that RERA should be abolished in its existing form & there is a need to rethink the role being played by it. The Apex court urged all States to examine who is actually benefiting from RERA’s functioning. The Bench comprising of Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi observed that RERA is helping defaulting builders rather than effectively protecting homebuyers or fulfilling its intended objectives. The Bench emphasized that States should revisit the original purpose behind the enactment of the RERA Act. As quoted by Bar and Bench, CJI Surya Kant stated “ All States should now think of...

FIR Filed Against Builder for Alleged Fraud

  CA Ramesh Agrawal An FIR has been registered by The Economic Offences Wing (EOW) of the Delhi Police against Gurugram based real estate company Experion Developers Private Limited and its related entity, Experion Capital Private Limited, following a complaint filed by the Enforcement Directorate (ED), according to an official statement. The complaint raised from the ED’s investigation into an alleged money laundering case involving Religare Finvest Limited (RFL). During the probe, the ED found that former promoters of RFL, Malvinder Mohan Singh and Shivinder Mohan Singh, allegedly diverted around Rs 2,036 crore through entities under their control. As part of this diversion, the ED alleged that Rs 150 crore from RFL was used to acquire a 27.86-acre land parcel in Sector 62, Gurugram. On 4 th February 2020, the ED attached this land, which also included a 9.1-acre portion owned by Dignity Buildcon Private Limited. During further investigation, the ED observed that the Exp...