The
Bombay High Court while deciding the case of Lavasa Corporation that is
developed under the township project in the Pune stated that RERA needs to
apply for the cases based on the long-term agreements.
The
court has held that RERA applies to the said case wherein the citizens are
seeking compensation due to the delay in having 3 flats in Lavasa Township as
they have paid more than 80% of the purchase price to the builder and the
project is yet to be completed.
Lavasa
Corporation filed the appeals challenging the orders that have been passed by Maharashtra
RERA Appellate Tribunal this year. Under the RERA Act, minimum of 70% of buyers’ money is kept in
a separate account. Money is the said account is to be used by the builders to
easily enable the construction on the land that is related.
The
appeal of Lavasa Corporation was aimed at claiming relief on the ground that
neither the provisions of RERA apply in the case of Lease Agreements nor does the definition of 'promoter' include the term
'lessor' under the Act.
The
argument of Lavasa Corporation was regarding the relationship of the company with
the persons that "lessor and lessee". Their main contention was that
there has been no sale or transfer of title of Apartments.
The
High Court stated that the legislative intent could not be excluded based on
the argument on long-term lease as it would defeat the purpose of the law. The execution
of Lease Agreements by the developers is an act to conveniently escape the clutches
of the Act's provisions.
The
main objective of RERA is to ensure accountability and to provide
comprehensive, speedy remedy and effectiveness to the aggrieved persons.
The
HC considered the fact that 80% of the purchase price has already been paid which
amounts to sale of the apartment. The Bombay High Court ultimately ruled that the
provisions of Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority shall apply to the
long-term lease agreements and that the Authority has its jurisdiction in such
matters.
The
court further held that 3 people in the particular cases can avail the remedy
that is provided under section 18 of the Act to seek the refund alongwith
interest and compensation.
Comments
Post a Comment