Skip to main content

NCLT takes action against Builders under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC)




Recently, various Real Estate Developers had approached the Supreme Court challenging the constitutional validity of the amendment made in the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) which deems the status of allottees as ‘financial creditors’ under the Act. Very recently the Supreme Court upheld the said amendment in Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) and rejected the plea of the real estate developers in the case of Pioneer Urban Land and infrastructure Limited & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors. and recognized the status of homebuyers at par with that of the financial creditors.

Availing the benefits of the Supreme Court judgment, a number of homebuyers have approached the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) to initiate insolvency proceedings against the defaulting developers. The NCLT has initiated insolvency proceedings against the developers - Umang Realtech Homes Pvt. Ltd. and Today Homes Noida Pvt. Ltd. after they failed to deliver the flats to the homebuyers in the specified time.

It was after two homebuyers moved to the tribunal stating that they had invested around Rs 1 crore for a Flat in the project ‘Winter Hills 77’ of the developer Umang Realtech Homes being developed in Gurugram, and that the developer  defaulted in delivery of possession to the homebuyers which was promised to be delivered by 2015.

In a similar case, a group of buyers approached the NCLT against the developer - Today Homes Noida Pvt. Ltd.  after the builder failed to deliver flats to the homebuyers by 2016 at the ‘Ridge Residency’ project in Sector 135, Noida.

An interim resolution professional (IRP) has been appointed by the NCLT to take over the management of the developer Today Homes Noida.

The developer contended before the tribunal that it has got four-year extension from the UP Real Estate Regulation Authority (RERA) to complete the project by 2021, which was rejected by NCLT stating that the provisions of IBC overrides the provisions of RERA.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

RERA Awards Rs. 65 Lakhs Compensation to Homebuyer for 9 Years Delay in Flat Possession

  CA Ramesh Agrawal In a recent decision, the Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (HRERA) has directed a builder to compensate a homebuyer with ₹65 lakh for an inordinate delay of over nine years in handing over a flat in Gurugram. Key Highlights: Background of the Case : The homebuyer had booked a flat in 2013, with the developer promising possession within a stipulated timeframe i.e., 7 th December 2015. However, the possession was delayed by more than nine years. Developer's Justifications : The builder attributed the delay to unforeseen circumstances, including the COVID-19 pandemic, the demise of the chairman of environmental impact assessment (EIA) committee, and inadequate water supply. H-RERA's Verdict : After reviewing the case, HRERA rejected the developer's justifications, deeming them insufficient to warrant such a prolonged delay. The authority emphasized that the reasons cited did not qualify as fo...

Supreme Court Ruling Warns Homebuyers: Registration Is Not Ownership

CA Ramesh Agrawal The Supreme Court in a significant ruling has stated that only registering a property does not make someone its legal owner. The judgement, delivered in the Mahnoor Fatima Imran vs M/s Visweswara Infrastructure Private Limited case, has direct implications for millions of Indian homebuyers and investors. If someone has bought a property solely based on a registered sale deed, then have a look at the below points.   Understanding the Law: Registration Does Not Equal Ownership “Ownership of a property comprises several aspects, of which registration is only one,” says Mr. Harsh Parikh, partner at a Law Firm, Khaitan & Co. Under Indian law, properties above Rs. 100 require registration, but that’s not all. “A buyer must also prove full payment, possession, and custody of original title documents,” he explains. Chairman and Director of Prime Developments, Mr. Rakesh Malhotra stated that “Registration provides prima facie evidence of a transaction, but it doesn’t c...

Municipality Demolishes Illegal & Unsafe Structures

  CA Ramesh Agrawal The Sambhajinagar Municipal Corporation (CSMC) has started an anti-encroachment campaign, to keep the city clean, safer, free up public space, etc. Details of the same are mentioned as below: - Drive Moves To Gulmandi Area: - After cleaning up areas like Beed Bypass and Mukundwadi, now the clean campaign has moved to Gulmandi area, which is busy & crowded market zone. The move shows that the Authorities are serious for removing illegal building all across the city. Illegal Constructions & extension demolished: - The Authorities have targeted illegal buildings & extension of around 25 Shops in bustling Rangar Galli Market & its surrounding areas. During the operation demolition of a run-down building was carried out with the presence of police. Ongoing Efforts : - Additional Municipal Commissioner, Mr. Santosh Wahule explained that this campaign in Gulmandi was carried out on the instructions of the Civic Chief G. Sreekanth. This clean campaign ...