Skip to main content

Homebuyers Are Entitled To Reasonable Compensation For Delay In Possession: Supreme Court


                                                                            Ramesh Agrawal ( LL.B, CA)       www.reramaster.com

Lot many Builder/Developers have failed to give possession of the property to homebuyers within the agreed period. This week Hon. Supreme Court has held that homebuyers are entitled to reasonable compensation for “delayed handing over of possession” and for the failure of the developer to fulfil their promises regarding the amenities.

Homebuyers had booked apartments through DLF Southern Homes Pvt. Ltd. or Begur OMR Homes Pvt. Ltd. in project called Westend heights at New Town DLF, Bangalore. This project is spread in 27.5 Acres with 1980 units in 19 towers.

The bench comprising Justices DY Chandrachud and KM Joseph stated that ‘service’ means a service in any form, of any description which is made available to potential users including the provision of facilities in connection with housing construction and other things.

The verdict of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) which, on July 2, 2019, had dismissed the complaints of 339 flat buyers. It had held that they were not entitled to the compensation more than what was stipulated in their Builder Buyer agreement for delayed possession and the lack of assured amenities.

Hon. Supreme Court said that in case there is  DELAY in handing over of possession beyond the contractually stipulated period, the jurisdiction of the consumer forum to ward just and reasonable compensation is not constrained by the terms of a rate in the builders’ agreement.

The Top Court have told Developers to pay the compensation within a period of one month from the date of judgment and cautioned that if they fail in making payment, then it will 9% Per Annum Interest till the time of payment.


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

RERA Awards Rs. 65 Lakhs Compensation to Homebuyer for 9 Years Delay in Flat Possession

  CA Ramesh Agrawal In a recent decision, the Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (HRERA) has directed a builder to compensate a homebuyer with ₹65 lakh for an inordinate delay of over nine years in handing over a flat in Gurugram. Key Highlights: Background of the Case : The homebuyer had booked a flat in 2013, with the developer promising possession within a stipulated timeframe i.e., 7 th December 2015. However, the possession was delayed by more than nine years. Developer's Justifications : The builder attributed the delay to unforeseen circumstances, including the COVID-19 pandemic, the demise of the chairman of environmental impact assessment (EIA) committee, and inadequate water supply. H-RERA's Verdict : After reviewing the case, HRERA rejected the developer's justifications, deeming them insufficient to warrant such a prolonged delay. The authority emphasized that the reasons cited did not qualify as fo...
Post a Comment
Read more

RERA SHOULD BE ABOLISHED - SUPREME COURT

  CA Ramesh Agrawal On 12 th February 2026, the Supreme Court expressed serious dissatisfaction with the functioning of the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA), indicating that the institution, should be abolished in its current form. In this regard please note: - The Hon. Supreme Court strongly criticized the current functioning & working of RERA and observed that RERA should be abolished in its existing form & there is a need to rethink the role being played by it. The Apex court urged all States to examine who is actually benefiting from RERA’s functioning. The Bench comprising of Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi observed that RERA is helping defaulting builders rather than effectively protecting homebuyers or fulfilling its intended objectives. The Bench emphasized that States should revisit the original purpose behind the enactment of the RERA Act. As quoted by Bar and Bench, CJI Surya Kant stated “ All States should now think of...
Post a Comment
Read more

Supreme Court Ruling Warns Homebuyers: Registration Is Not Ownership

CA Ramesh Agrawal The Supreme Court in a significant ruling has stated that only registering a property does not make someone its legal owner. The judgement, delivered in the Mahnoor Fatima Imran vs M/s Visweswara Infrastructure Private Limited case, has direct implications for millions of Indian homebuyers and investors. If someone has bought a property solely based on a registered sale deed, then have a look at the below points.   Understanding the Law: Registration Does Not Equal Ownership “Ownership of a property comprises several aspects, of which registration is only one,” says Mr. Harsh Parikh, partner at a Law Firm, Khaitan & Co. Under Indian law, properties above Rs. 100 require registration, but that’s not all. “A buyer must also prove full payment, possession, and custody of original title documents,” he explains. Chairman and Director of Prime Developments, Mr. Rakesh Malhotra stated that “Registration provides prima facie evidence of a transaction, but it doesn’t c...
Post a Comment
Read more