Skip to main content

STATE CONSUMER FORUM DIRECTS A BUILDER TO REFUND HOME BUYER WITH COMPENSATION


CA Ramesh Agrawal

 

A builder of Chandigarh namely Sushma Buildtech Limited has been directed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (SCDRC) to refund Rs 52.74 Lakh and a compensation of Rs 50,000 to an Army official for delaying the possession of an apartment by five months.

Major Ashish Saurabh Sharma, booked a residential apartment in a project known as  Sushma Crescent  located at Gazipur, Zirakpur, Punjab. The total price of the apartment was Rs 55.77 Lakh and the buyer paid Rs 52.74 lakhs during January 2015 to June 2016.

As per agreement, the Company was committed to give possession of the apartment within 36 months from the date of execution of the agreement. The Company failed to deliver the possession in time.

During the case the company pleaded that the homebuyer made a default in making payment and his allotment was cancelled as per the terms of the buyer agreement after giving many opportunities to clear outstanding dues.

However, the court stated that the homebuyer had booked the unit under a construction linked payment plan and he had already made a payment of Rs 52.74 lakh, which is more than 95% of the total consideration price of apartment. Further, as per the agreement payment schedule, the homebuyer was required to pay Rs 50.99 lakh.

Therefore, the objection raised on the part of outstanding payments does not hold good. The company also stated that possession was offered vide letter dated April 24, 2019, but the homebuyer did not come forward to take it.

The court stated that the possession was offered without a completion certificate (CC) and there  is no obligation on the part of the homebuyer to take possession when there is no completion certificate.

 

Labels:

Comments

  1. Unknown19 April 2021 at 00:21

    Proper action taken by the court , I wish in our case , similar verdict should be given.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Unknown19 April 2021 at 00:22

    Nice information by Mr. Ramesh

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

RERA Awards Rs. 65 Lakhs Compensation to Homebuyer for 9 Years Delay in Flat Possession

  CA Ramesh Agrawal In a recent decision, the Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (HRERA) has directed a builder to compensate a homebuyer with ₹65 lakh for an inordinate delay of over nine years in handing over a flat in Gurugram. Key Highlights: Background of the Case : The homebuyer had booked a flat in 2013, with the developer promising possession within a stipulated timeframe i.e., 7 th December 2015. However, the possession was delayed by more than nine years. Developer's Justifications : The builder attributed the delay to unforeseen circumstances, including the COVID-19 pandemic, the demise of the chairman of environmental impact assessment (EIA) committee, and inadequate water supply. H-RERA's Verdict : After reviewing the case, HRERA rejected the developer's justifications, deeming them insufficient to warrant such a prolonged delay. The authority emphasized that the reasons cited did not qualify as fo...
Post a Comment
Read more

Supreme Court Ruling Warns Homebuyers: Registration Is Not Ownership

CA Ramesh Agrawal The Supreme Court in a significant ruling has stated that only registering a property does not make someone its legal owner. The judgement, delivered in the Mahnoor Fatima Imran vs M/s Visweswara Infrastructure Private Limited case, has direct implications for millions of Indian homebuyers and investors. If someone has bought a property solely based on a registered sale deed, then have a look at the below points.   Understanding the Law: Registration Does Not Equal Ownership “Ownership of a property comprises several aspects, of which registration is only one,” says Mr. Harsh Parikh, partner at a Law Firm, Khaitan & Co. Under Indian law, properties above Rs. 100 require registration, but that’s not all. “A buyer must also prove full payment, possession, and custody of original title documents,” he explains. Chairman and Director of Prime Developments, Mr. Rakesh Malhotra stated that “Registration provides prima facie evidence of a transaction, but it doesn’t c...
Post a Comment
Read more

Municipality Demolishes Illegal & Unsafe Structures

  CA Ramesh Agrawal The Sambhajinagar Municipal Corporation (CSMC) has started an anti-encroachment campaign, to keep the city clean, safer, free up public space, etc. Details of the same are mentioned as below: - Drive Moves To Gulmandi Area: - After cleaning up areas like Beed Bypass and Mukundwadi, now the clean campaign has moved to Gulmandi area, which is busy & crowded market zone. The move shows that the Authorities are serious for removing illegal building all across the city. Illegal Constructions & extension demolished: - The Authorities have targeted illegal buildings & extension of around 25 Shops in bustling Rangar Galli Market & its surrounding areas. During the operation demolition of a run-down building was carried out with the presence of police. Ongoing Efforts : - Additional Municipal Commissioner, Mr. Santosh Wahule explained that this campaign in Gulmandi was carried out on the instructions of the Civic Chief G. Sreekanth. This clean campaign ...
Post a Comment
Read more