Ramesh Agrawal ( LL.B. & CA )
Majority of Builders have cheated homebuyers in many
ways including not giving possession in time, giving delay possession without
any compensation for delay, etc. Nowadays homebuyers
are gradually becoming active and filing
cases against dishonest Builders. Some homebuyers are approaching Police , some
are approaching RERA Court/authority and are approaching Consumer Forum.
In Consumer Forum generally Builders argue since RERA is there homebuyers
can not file complaint against them in the Consumer Forum. For instance in a recent case a Builder namely
M/s. Imperia Structures argued that all the cases related to construction and
completion of its project should be dealt under the RERA Law. This contention has been
denied by Supreme Court.
The appeal was filed by
the M/s. Imperia Structures against the judgment passed by National Consumer
Forum (NCDRC) on the complaint of 10 homebuyers of the project called ESFERA
situated at Sector 13C, Gurugram, Haryana. The Project was launched in 2011 by
Builder and lot of homebuyers booked with the hope of getting their dreamhome
in time. Being disappointed with the delay they filed complaint in NCDRC
alleging that despite the lapse of agreed 42 months there is no sign of possession
of their dream homes in near future.
Hon. Supreme Court in
its verdict pronounced that despite RERA in existence there is no bar for the
Homebuyers to approach Consumer Forum for Refund & compensation. Supreme
Court also imposed a cost of Rs. 50,000 to be paid by the Builder for each of
the Complaint.
The judicial bench of
Justices UU Lalit and Vineet Saran stated in its judgment “The RERA does not statutorily force a person to
withdraw any such complaint nor do the provisions of the RERA Act create any
mechanism for transfer of such pending proceedings to authorities under the
RERA Act. Again, insofar as cases, where such proceedings under the CP Act are
initiated after the provisions of the RERA Act, came into force, there is
nothing in the RERA Act which bars such initiation. The absence of bar under
Section 79 to the initiation of proceedings before a forum which cannot be
called a Civil Court and express saving
under Section 88 of the RERA Act, make the position quite clear,”
This is a landmark
judgement for the homebuyers because it lights up the fact that homebuyers have
a right to choose between RERA and the
Consumer Forum for filing of their complaints against the builders.
Comments
Post a Comment