Skip to main content

Arrest Warrant by RERA against Ansal directors for not refunding to homebuyer

 


CA Ramesh Agrawal

Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) has ordered for the issuance of Arrest Warrant against the directors of Ansal Housing Limited for noncompliance of an earlier order to refund to Homebuyers.

RERA has ordered Ansal Housing Director’s to pay Rs. 5 Crores along with interest @ 9.3% to Mr. Rajeev Sharma & 4 other members, who complained against the directors.

Mr. Sharma & other complainants were buyer of flats in Ansal Heights in Sector 86 launched in 2010. Project having 750 Units was supposed to be completed by 2014.

According to earlier order, Ansal neither refunded the money nor filed any appeal against the directive despite many reminders. Summon has been issued to the Manager of the company.

RERA earlier ordered to attach the Bank Account of the Developer, but it was informed that the Bank Account did not have any balance. The Developer was then asked to submit all the details of the Assets. Talking about the latest order, a person on behalf of the company said that they are in touch with the complainants to finally resolve the issue.


Comments

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) has ordered for the issuance of Arrest Warrant against the directors of Ansal Housing Limited for noncompliance of an earlier order to refund to Homebuyers.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

RERA Awards Rs. 65 Lakhs Compensation to Homebuyer for 9 Years Delay in Flat Possession

  CA Ramesh Agrawal In a recent decision, the Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (HRERA) has directed a builder to compensate a homebuyer with ₹65 lakh for an inordinate delay of over nine years in handing over a flat in Gurugram. Key Highlights: Background of the Case : The homebuyer had booked a flat in 2013, with the developer promising possession within a stipulated timeframe i.e., 7 th December 2015. However, the possession was delayed by more than nine years. Developer's Justifications : The builder attributed the delay to unforeseen circumstances, including the COVID-19 pandemic, the demise of the chairman of environmental impact assessment (EIA) committee, and inadequate water supply. H-RERA's Verdict : After reviewing the case, HRERA rejected the developer's justifications, deeming them insufficient to warrant such a prolonged delay. The authority emphasized that the reasons cited did not qualify as fo...

RERA SHOULD BE ABOLISHED - SUPREME COURT

  CA Ramesh Agrawal On 12 th February 2026, the Supreme Court expressed serious dissatisfaction with the functioning of the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA), indicating that the institution, should be abolished in its current form. In this regard please note: - The Hon. Supreme Court strongly criticized the current functioning & working of RERA and observed that RERA should be abolished in its existing form & there is a need to rethink the role being played by it. The Apex court urged all States to examine who is actually benefiting from RERA’s functioning. The Bench comprising of Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi observed that RERA is helping defaulting builders rather than effectively protecting homebuyers or fulfilling its intended objectives. The Bench emphasized that States should revisit the original purpose behind the enactment of the RERA Act. As quoted by Bar and Bench, CJI Surya Kant stated “ All States should now think of...

Supreme Court Ruling Warns Homebuyers: Registration Is Not Ownership

CA Ramesh Agrawal The Supreme Court in a significant ruling has stated that only registering a property does not make someone its legal owner. The judgement, delivered in the Mahnoor Fatima Imran vs M/s Visweswara Infrastructure Private Limited case, has direct implications for millions of Indian homebuyers and investors. If someone has bought a property solely based on a registered sale deed, then have a look at the below points.   Understanding the Law: Registration Does Not Equal Ownership “Ownership of a property comprises several aspects, of which registration is only one,” says Mr. Harsh Parikh, partner at a Law Firm, Khaitan & Co. Under Indian law, properties above Rs. 100 require registration, but that’s not all. “A buyer must also prove full payment, possession, and custody of original title documents,” he explains. Chairman and Director of Prime Developments, Mr. Rakesh Malhotra stated that “Registration provides prima facie evidence of a transaction, but it doesn’t c...