Skip to main content

RERA cancelled registration of 3 Projects


 

CA Ramesh Agrawal

RERA registration of 3 real estate projects have been cancelled by Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority (UP-RERA). As per the officials’ statements, the promoters of Raksha Vigyan Sanskriti Phase-2, Antriksh Sanskriti Phase-2 and Antriksh Sanskriti Phase-3 have violated provision of the RERA law.

These builders have not followed order issued by Authority & project was not completed risking the investments of the allotees. In the allotees mostly are present & former government employees.

As per RERA officials, many complaints were received regarding these projects. Authority conducted a site inspection of these projects & they found out that chances of completing the projects is uncertain.

Construction & Development work for these 3 projects was started in 2015 was schedules to be finished by July 22 & June 23 respectively.

‘Project Advisory and Monitoring Committee’ has been constituted under Mrs Kalpana Mishra, member of the authority to decide that what further course of actions to be taken & for completion of take remaining development work of these 3 Projects u/s 8 of the RERA Act 2016. Various attempts were made to contact Rakesh Yadav (Director) of Antriksh Realtek Pvt Ltd for the comments, but he did not respond.

Allotees said that they approached various authorities in UP to get the issue resolved, in fact they even reached out to PM Office as well. They made a Final Representation to UP-RERA, following to which the registrations of 3 projects have been cancelled.

Labels:

Comments

  1. Reg24 July 2022 at 20:00

    Great to see RERA effect on errant builders. Hope this will put an end to all the fraudsters who enter this business

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

RERA Awards Rs. 65 Lakhs Compensation to Homebuyer for 9 Years Delay in Flat Possession

  CA Ramesh Agrawal In a recent decision, the Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (HRERA) has directed a builder to compensate a homebuyer with ₹65 lakh for an inordinate delay of over nine years in handing over a flat in Gurugram. Key Highlights: Background of the Case : The homebuyer had booked a flat in 2013, with the developer promising possession within a stipulated timeframe i.e., 7 th December 2015. However, the possession was delayed by more than nine years. Developer's Justifications : The builder attributed the delay to unforeseen circumstances, including the COVID-19 pandemic, the demise of the chairman of environmental impact assessment (EIA) committee, and inadequate water supply. H-RERA's Verdict : After reviewing the case, HRERA rejected the developer's justifications, deeming them insufficient to warrant such a prolonged delay. The authority emphasized that the reasons cited did not qualify as fo...
Post a Comment
Read more

RERA SHOULD BE ABOLISHED - SUPREME COURT

  CA Ramesh Agrawal On 12 th February 2026, the Supreme Court expressed serious dissatisfaction with the functioning of the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA), indicating that the institution, should be abolished in its current form. In this regard please note: - The Hon. Supreme Court strongly criticized the current functioning & working of RERA and observed that RERA should be abolished in its existing form & there is a need to rethink the role being played by it. The Apex court urged all States to examine who is actually benefiting from RERA’s functioning. The Bench comprising of Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi observed that RERA is helping defaulting builders rather than effectively protecting homebuyers or fulfilling its intended objectives. The Bench emphasized that States should revisit the original purpose behind the enactment of the RERA Act. As quoted by Bar and Bench, CJI Surya Kant stated “ All States should now think of...
Post a Comment
Read more

Supreme Court Ruling Warns Homebuyers: Registration Is Not Ownership

CA Ramesh Agrawal The Supreme Court in a significant ruling has stated that only registering a property does not make someone its legal owner. The judgement, delivered in the Mahnoor Fatima Imran vs M/s Visweswara Infrastructure Private Limited case, has direct implications for millions of Indian homebuyers and investors. If someone has bought a property solely based on a registered sale deed, then have a look at the below points.   Understanding the Law: Registration Does Not Equal Ownership “Ownership of a property comprises several aspects, of which registration is only one,” says Mr. Harsh Parikh, partner at a Law Firm, Khaitan & Co. Under Indian law, properties above Rs. 100 require registration, but that’s not all. “A buyer must also prove full payment, possession, and custody of original title documents,” he explains. Chairman and Director of Prime Developments, Mr. Rakesh Malhotra stated that “Registration provides prima facie evidence of a transaction, but it doesn’t c...
Post a Comment
Read more