RERA takes over the project of the Builder to Complete

Ramesh Agrawal (LL.B. & CA)

Chhattisgarh’s Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) has passed an order to hand over the private project i.e., City of Valencia located in “Narada” of Chhattisgarh district to Chhattisgarh Housing Board. This action is to safeguard the interest of plot allotees. Action was taken up against builder Aftab Siddiqui who was reluctant to develop the project & provide even the basic necessities such as Water, Electricity, Sewer, Road, etc. as mentioned in the brochure.

Builder prepared a housing project in Narada in 2010 of 1072 plots. Because of the attractive brochure and other unfair means he was able to sell 691 plots and collected over Rs 41 Crores from the public. Instead of developing the project, the builder siphoned off the funds. Project was supposed to be finished by 2015, no development work commenced even after 6 years.

Chhattisgarh’s RERA President Mr. Vivek Dhand said that 130 allottees of the project ‘City of Valencia’ located in Narada, Raipur, filed a complaint in 2019 with the grievance that the development work of the project was not completed. In the hearing, it came to light that the builder had obtained development permission in the year 2010 to construct a fully equipped residential colony with a total 1072 plots. After hearing of the case, the RERA Authority decided to hand over the project to the Chhattisgarh Housing Board in the interest of the plot allottees.

Now ownership of this project will be with Chhattisgarh Housing Board, and they will submit the action plan to RERA for the development of basic facilities in ‘City of Valencia’ within two months. In the order, the Raipur Collector has been asked to take necessary action for the transfer of the project and land to the Chhattisgarh Housing Board. He has been authorized to complete all the formalities.

Comments

RERA Awards Rs. 65 Lakhs Compensation to Homebuyer for 9 Years Delay in Flat Possession

CA Ramesh Agrawal In a recent decision, the Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (HRERA) has directed a builder to compensate a homebuyer with ₹65 lakh for an inordinate delay of over nine years in handing over a flat in Gurugram. Key Highlights: Background of the Case : The homebuyer had booked a flat in 2013, with the developer promising possession within a stipulated timeframe i.e., 7 th December 2015. However, the possession was delayed by more than nine years. Developer's Justifications : The builder attributed the delay to unforeseen circumstances, including the COVID-19 pandemic, the demise of the chairman of environmental impact assessment (EIA) committee, and inadequate water supply. H-RERA's Verdict : After reviewing the case, HRERA rejected the developer's justifications, deeming them insufficient to warrant such a prolonged delay. The authority emphasized that the reasons cited did not qualify as fo...

RERA SHOULD BE ABOLISHED - SUPREME COURT

CA Ramesh Agrawal On 12 th February 2026, the Supreme Court expressed serious dissatisfaction with the functioning of the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA), indicating that the institution, should be abolished in its current form. In this regard please note: - The Hon. Supreme Court strongly criticized the current functioning & working of RERA and observed that RERA should be abolished in its existing form & there is a need to rethink the role being played by it. The Apex court urged all States to examine who is actually benefiting from RERA’s functioning. The Bench comprising of Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi observed that RERA is helping defaulting builders rather than effectively protecting homebuyers or fulfilling its intended objectives. The Bench emphasized that States should revisit the original purpose behind the enactment of the RERA Act. As quoted by Bar and Bench, CJI Surya Kant stated “ All States should now think of...

Supreme Court Ruling Warns Homebuyers: Registration Is Not Ownership

CA Ramesh Agrawal The Supreme Court in a significant ruling has stated that only registering a property does not make someone its legal owner. The judgement, delivered in the Mahnoor Fatima Imran vs M/s Visweswara Infrastructure Private Limited case, has direct implications for millions of Indian homebuyers and investors. If someone has bought a property solely based on a registered sale deed, then have a look at the below points. Understanding the Law: Registration Does Not Equal Ownership “Ownership of a property comprises several aspects, of which registration is only one,” says Mr. Harsh Parikh, partner at a Law Firm, Khaitan & Co. Under Indian law, properties above Rs. 100 require registration, but that’s not all. “A buyer must also prove full payment, possession, and custody of original title documents,” he explains. Chairman and Director of Prime Developments, Mr. Rakesh Malhotra stated that “Registration provides prima facie evidence of a transaction, but it doesn’t c...

RERA Master

Search This Blog